DFA rail against the blogsites
Monday, May 15th, 2006I came across this link on the Ninja Tune forum and thought it was of some interest. Apparently DFA requested that their tracks be removed from the popular Headfone Sex blog, stating that posting them in advance of their release in this manner was highly detrimental to their sales etc.
In doing so they highlight a growing issue in music, namely: does the model currently used to pay artists for their musical works actually stand up in 2006? Now that piracy has grown beyond all control - be it via P2P, newsgroups, YouSendIt links or music blogs - its safe to say that if you want to avoid buying an album, you can certainly do so… and in the process ensure that the artist does not get fair remuneration for their efforts.
Word also reaches me that AIM (the Association of Independent Music) are now lobbying the UK government, urging them to re-think the laws governing Intellectual Property. The complete details are vague, but I believe the main jist is that AIM would like to see taxes placed on consumer goods such as CDRs, MP3 players, ISP accounts etc., from which monies would be distributed to those artists whose music is downloaded. I can see the benefit here: it would mean music would effectively become free, with your downloads being monitored more (presumably) and the collected tax monies being redistributed according to what’s been downloaded.
Changing times are upon us… but what do YOU think?

