utter neevs presents JLIAT………………………
Monday, May 29th, 200630.05.06
23:30hrs
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
_________________________________________________
Hi
I have just despatched 2CDRs - they represent ‘work in progress’ and so would be grateful for any feedback - they were both made from samples from site recordings and in away i think represent ideas or themes in my earlier electronic work - but using actual events. Rain - certainly parodies rhythmic music - and summer parodies ‘drone’ - there is ambivalence however between parody of the artificial and the artificial rendering of the real - which is where Kant comes in, again perhaps pretentious - or perhaps not.
Perhaps they represent a bridge between electronic and conceptual drawing on the methods used in the more recent noise works. I resisted the temptation to ‘over process’ so perhaps a casual listener would suppose some uniform time flowing through the work…and not become aware of its method - blithely thinking then this is an example of a field recording of ‘things in
themselves’….
Cheers - james
_____
previous mail -
hi james
look forward to receiving the disks. i will try my best to lend my thoughts to your new work.
i like the idea of “summer parodies ‘drone’”
i mean, to start off a work using location recordings is to
immediately borrow from nature?? i guess. but i had not really thought about it as a parody before. the idea of
reality simulation is i think different from parodying reality, there
is something more
concrete about parody and something more transcendental about simulation.
also the real/unreal paradox.
i think radio is a good place to explore these notions as it is
somewhat removed from a tangible reality? ie - faceless voice/disembodied voice. this idea is something central to my show, if not very noticable.
cheers
Lee
>
> _____
Leg.
www.cyrk.org - for no info
There is scope for interpretation www.jameswhitehead.org
